Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Our example subsystem will keep track of all deployments of certain types containing a special marker file, and expose operations to see how long these deployments have been deployed.

Create the skeleton project

To make your life easier we have provided a maven archetype which will create a skeleton project for implementing subsystems.

Maven will download the archetype and it's dependencies, and ask you some questions:

  Instruction
1 Enter the groupId you wish to use
2 Enter the artifactId you wish to use
3 Enter the version you wish to use, or just hit Enter if you wish to accept the default 1.0-SNAPSHOT
4 Enter the java package you wish to use, or just hit Enter if you wish to accept the default (which is copied from groupId).
5 Enter the module name you wish to use for your extension.
6 Finally, if you are happy with your choices, hit Enter and Maven will generate the project for you.

You can also do this in Eclipse, see Creating your own application for more details. We now have a skeleton project that you can use to implement a subsystem. Import the acme-subsystem project into your favourite IDE. A nice side-effect of running this in the IDE is that you can see the javadoc of JBoss AS 7 classes and interfaces imported by the skeleton code. If you do a mvn install in the project it will work if we plug it into JBoss AS 7, but before doing that we will change it to do something more useful.

The rest of this section modifies the skeleton project created by the archetype to do something more useful, and the full code can be found in acme-subsystem.zip.

If you do a mvn install in the created project, you will see some tests being run

We will talk about these later in the Testing the parsers section.

NOTE!!!! There is a problem with the 7.1.1.Final version of the artifact, so when running the tests you will see errors like these:

The fix for this is to move src/main/resources/com/acme/corp/tracker/subsystem/extension/LocalDescriptions.properties to src/main/resources/com/acme/corp/tracker/extension/LocalDescriptions.properties substituting com/acme/corp/tracker with the path for what you entered as the package name.

Create the schema

First, let us define the schema for our subsystem. Rename src/main/resources/schema/mysubsystem.xsd to src/main/resources/schema/acme.xsd. Then open acme.xsd and modify it to the following

Note that we modified the xmlns and targetNamespace values to urn.com.acme.corp.tracker:1.0. Our new subsystem element has a child called deployment-types, which in turn can have zero or more children called deployment-type. Each deployment-type has a required suffix attribute, and a tick attribute which defaults to true.

Now modify the com.acme.corp.tracker.extension.SubsystemExtension class to contain the new namespace.

Design and define the model structure

The following example xml contains a valid subsystem configuration, we will see how to plug this in to JBoss AS 7 later in this tutorial.

Now when designing our model, we can either do a one to one mapping between the schema and the model or come up with something slightly or very different. To keep things simple, let us stay pretty true to the schema so that when executing a :read-resource(recursive=true) against our subsystem we'll see something like:

Each deployment-type in the xml becomes in the model a child resource of the subsystem's root resource. The child resource's child-type is type, and it is indexed by its suffix. Each type resource then contains the tick attribute.

We also need a name for our subsystem, to do that change com.acme.corp.tracker.extension.SubsystemExtension:

Once we are finished our subsystem will be available under /subsystem=tracker.

The SubsystemExtension.initialize() method defines the model, currently it sets up the basics to add our subsystem to the model:

The registerSubsystem() call registers our subsystem with the extension context. At the end of the method we register our parser with the returned SubsystemRegistration to be able to marshal our subsystem's model back to the main configuration file when it is modified. We will add more functionality to this method later.

Registering the core subsystem model

Next we obtain a ManagementResourceRegistration by registering the subsystem model. This is a compulsory step for every new subsystem.

It's parameter is an implementation of the ResourceDefinition interface, which means that when you call /subsystem=tracker:read-resource-description the information you see comes from model that is defined by SubsystemDefinition.INSTANCE.

Since we need child resource type we need to add new ResourceDefinition,

The ManagementResourceRegistration obtained in SubsystemExtension.initialize() is then used to add additional operations or to register submodels to the /subsystem=tracker address. Every subsystem and resource must have an ADD method which can be achieved by the following line inside registerOperations in your ResourceDefinition or by providing it in constructor of your SimpleResourceDefinition just as we did in example above.

The parameters when registering an operation handler are:

  1. The name - i.e. ADD.
  2. The handler instance - we will talk more about this below
  3. The handler description provider - we will talk more about this below.
  4. Whether this operation handler is inherited - false means that this operation is not inherited, and will only apply to /subsystem=tracker. The content for this operation handler will be provided by 3.

Let us first look at the description provider which is quite simple since this operation takes no parameters. The addition of type children will be handled by another operation handler, as we will see later on.

There are two way to define DescriptionProvider, one is by defining it by hand using ModelNode, but as this has show to be very error prone there are lots of helper methods to help you automatically describe the model. Flowing example is done by manually defining Description provider for ADD operation handler

Or you can use API that helps you do that for you. For Add and Remove methods there are classes DefaultResourceAddDescriptionProvider and DefaultResourceRemoveDescriptionProvider that do work for you. In case you use SimpleResourceDefinition even that part is hidden from you.

resourceRegistration.registerOperationHandler(ADD, SubsystemAdd.INSTANCE, new DefaultResourceAddDescriptionProvider(resourceRegistration,descriptionResolver), false);
resourceRegistration.registerOperationHandler(REMOVE, SubsystemRemove.INSTANCE, new DefaultResourceRemoveDescriptionProvider(resourceRegistration,descriptionResolver), false);

For other operation handlers that are not add/remove you can use DefaultOperationDescriptionProvider that takes additional parameter of what is the name of operation and optional array of parameters/attributes operation takes. This is an example to register operation "add-mime" with two parameters:

When descriping an operation its description provider's OPERATION_NAME must match the name used when calling ManagementResourceRegistration.registerOperationHandler()

Next we have the actual operation handler instance, note that we have changed its populateModel() method to initialize the type child of the model.

SubsystemAdd also has a performBoottime() method which is used for initializing the deployer chain associated with this subsystem. We will talk about the deployers later on. However, the basic idea for all operation handlers is that we do any model updates before changing the actual runtime state.

The rule of thumb is that every thing that can be added, can also be removed so we have a remove handler for the subsystem registered
in SubsystemDefinition.registerOperations or just provide the operation handler in constructor.

SubsystemRemove extends AbstractRemoveStepHandler which takes care of removing the resource from the model so we don't need to override its performRemove() operation, also the add handler did not install any services (services will be discussed later) so we can delete the performRuntime() method generated by the archetype.

The description provider for the remove operation is simple and quite similar to that of the add handler where just name of the method changes.

Registering the subsystem child

The type child does not exist in our skeleton project so we need to implement the operations to add and remove them from the model.

First we need an add operation to add the type child, create a class called com.acme.corp.tracker.extension.TypeAddHandler. In this case we extend the org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractAddStepHandler class and implement the org.jboss.as.controller.descriptions.DescriptionProvider interface. org.jboss.as.controller.OperationStepHandler is the main interface for the operation handlers, and AbstractAddStepHandler is an implementation of that which does the plumbing work for adding a resource to the model.

Then we define subsystem model. Lets call it TypeDefinition and for ease of use let it extend SimpleResourceDefinition instead just implement ResourceDefinitionpublic .

Which will take care of describing the model for us. As you can see in example above we define SimpleAttributeDefinition named TICK, this is a mechanism to define Attributes in more type safe way and to add more common API to manipulate attributes. As you can see here we define default value of 1000 as also other constraints and capabilities. There could be other properties set such as validators, alternate names, xml name, flags for marking it attribute allows expressions and more.

Then we do the work of updating the model by implementing the populateModel() method from the AbstractAddStepHandler, which populates the model's attribute from the operation parameters. First we get hold of the model relative to the address of this operation (we will see later that we will register it against /subsystem=tracker/type=*), so we just specify an empty relative address, and we then populate our model with the parameters from the operation. There is operation validateAndSet on AttributeDefinition that helps us validate and set the model based on definition of the attribute.

We then override the performRuntime() method to perform our runtime changes, which in this case involves installing a service into the controller at the heart of JBoss AS 7. (AbstractAddStepHandler.performRuntime() is similar to AbstractBoottimeAddStepHandler.performBoottime() in that the model is updated before runtime changes are made.

Since the add methods will be of the format /subsystem=tracker/suffix=war:add(tick=1234), we look for the last element of the operation address, which is war in the example just given and use that as our suffix. We then create an instance of TrackerService and install that into the service target of the context and add the created service controller to the newControllers list.

The tracker service is quite simple. All services installed into JBoss AS 7 must implement the org.jboss.msc.service.Service interface.

We then have some fields to keep the tick count and a thread which when run outputs all the deployments registered with our service.

Next we have three methods which come from the Service interface. getValue() returns this service, start() is called when the service is started by the controller, stop is called when the service is stopped by the controller, and they start and stop the thread outputting the deployments.

Next we have a utility method to create the ServiceName which is used to register the service in the controller.

Finally we have some methods to add and remove deployments, and to set and read the tick. The 'cool' deployments will be explained later.

Since we are able to add type children, we need a way to be able to remove them, so we create a com.acme.corp.tracker.extension.TypeRemoveHandler. In this case we extend AbstractRemoveStepHandler which takes care of removing the resource from the model so we don't need to override its performRemove() operationa. But we need to implement the DescriptionProvider method to provide the model description, and since the add handler installs the TrackerService, we need to remove that in the performRuntime() method.

We then need a description provider for the type part of the model itself, so we modify TypeDefinitnion to registerAttribute

Then finally we need to specify that our new type child and associated handlers go under /subsystem=tracker/type=* in the model by adding registering it with the model in SubsystemExtension.initialize(). So we add the following just before the end of the method.

The above first creates a child of our main subsystem registration for the relative address type=*, and gets the typeChild registration.
To this we add the TypeAddHandler and TypeRemoveHandler.
The add variety is added under the name add and the remove handler under the name remove, and for each registered operation handler we use the handler singleton instance as both the handler parameter and as the DescriptionProvider.

Finally, we register tick as a read/write attribute, the null parameter means we don't do anything special with regards to reading it, for the write handler we supply it with an operation handler called TrackerTickHandler.
Registering it as a read/write attribute means we can use the :write-attribute operation to modify the value of the parameter, and it will be handled by TrackerTickHandler.

Not registering a write attribute handler makes the attribute read only.

TrackerTickHandler extends AbstractWriteAttributeHandler
directly, and so must implement its applyUpdateToRuntime and revertUpdateToRuntime method.
This takes care of model manipulation (validation, setting) but leaves us to do just to deal with what we need to do.

The operation used to execute this will be of the form /subsystem=tracker/type=war:write-attribute(name=tick,value=12345) so we first get the suffix from the operation address, and the tick value from the operation parameter's resolvedValue parameter, and use that to update the model.

We then add a new step associated with the RUNTIME stage to update the tick of the TrackerService for our suffix. This is essential since the call to context.getServiceRegistry() will fail unless the step accessing it belongs to the RUNTIME stage.

When implementing execute(), you must call context.completeStep() when you are done.

Parsing and marshalling of the subsystem xml

JBoss AS 7 uses the Stax API to parse the xml files. This is initialized in SubsystemExtension by mapping our parser onto our namespace:

We then need to write the parser. The contract is that we read our subsystem's xml and create the operations that will populate the model with the state contained in the xml. These operations will then be executed on our behalf as part of the parsing process. The entry point is the readElement() method.

So in the above we always create the add operation for our subsystem. Due to its address /subsystem=tracker defined by SUBSYSTEM_PATH this will trigger the SubsystemAddHandler we created earlier when we invoke /subsystem=tracker:add. We then parse the child elements and create an add operation for the child address for each type child. Since the address will for example be /subsystem=tracker/type=sar (defined by TYPE_PATH ) and TypeAddHandler is registered for all type subaddresses the TypeAddHandler will get invoked for those operations. Note that when we are parsing attribute tick we are using definition of attribute that we defined in TypeDefintion to parse attribute value and apply all rules that we specified for this attribute, this also enables us to property support expressions on attributes.

The parser is also used to marshal the model to xml whenever something modifies the model, for which the entry point is the writeContent() method:

Then we have to implement the SubsystemDescribeHandler which translates the current state of the model into operations similar to the ones created by the parser. The SubsystemDescribeHandler is only used when running in a managed domain, and is used when the host controller queries the domain controller for the configuration of the profile used to start up each server. In our case the SubsystemDescribeHandler adds the operation to add the subsystem and then adds the operation to add each type child. Since we are using ResourceDefinitinon for defining subsystem all that is generated for us, but if you want to customize that you can do it by implementing it like this.

Testing the parsers

Changes to tests between 7.0.0 and 7.0.1
The testing framework was moved from the archetype into the core JBoss AS 7 sources between JBoss AS 7.0.0 and JBoss AS 7.0.1, and has been improved upon and is used internally for testing JBoss AS 7's subsystems. The differences between the two versions is that in 7.0.0.Final the testing framework is bundled with the code generated by the archetype (in a sub-package of the package specified for your subsystem, e.g. com.acme.corp.tracker.support), and the test extends the AbstractParsingTest class.

From 7.0.1 the testing framework is now brought in via the org.jboss.as:jboss-as-subsystem-test maven artifact, and the test's superclass is org.jboss.as.subsystem.test.AbstractSubsystemTest. The concepts are the same but more and more functionality will be available as JBoss AS 7 is developed.

Now that we have modified our parsers we need to update our tests to reflect the new model. There are currently three tests testing the basic functionality, something which is a lot easier to debug from your IDE before you plug it into the application server. We will talk about these tests in turn and they all live in com.acme.corp.tracker.extension.SubsystemParsingTestCase. SubsystemParsingTestCase extends AbstractSubsystemTest which does a lot of the setup for you and contains utility methods for verifying things from your test. See the javadoc of that class for more information about the functionality available to you. And by all means feel free to add more tests for your subsystem, here we are only testing for the best case scenario while you will probably want to throw in a few tests for edge cases.

The first test we need to modify is testParseSubsystem(). It tests that the parsed xml becomes the expected operations that will be parsed into the server, so let us tweak this test to match our subsystem. First we tell the test to parse the xml into operations

There should be one operation for adding the subsystem itself and an operation for adding the deployment-type, so check we got two operations

Now check that the first operation is add for the address /subsystem=tracker:

Then check that the second operation is add for the address /subsystem=tracker, and that 12345 was picked up for the value of the tick parameter:

The second test we need to modify is testInstallIntoController() which tests that the xml installs properly into the controller. In other words we are making sure that the add operations we created earlier work properly. First we create the xml and install it into the controller. Behind the scenes this will parse the xml into operations as we saw in the last test, but it will also create a new controller and boot that up using the created operations

The returned KernelServices allow us to execute operations on the controller, and to read the whole model.

Now we make sure that the structure of the model within the controller has the expected format and values

The last test provided is called testParseAndMarshalModel(). It's main purpose is to make sure that our SubsystemParser.writeContent() works as expected. This is achieved by starting a controller in the same way as before

Now we read the model and the xml that was persisted from the first controller, and use that xml to start a second controller

Finally we read the model from the second controller, and make sure that the models are identical by calling compare() on the test superclass.

We then have a test that needs no changing from what the archetype provides us with. As we have seen before we start a controller

We then call /subsystem=tracker:describe which outputs the subsystem as operations needed to reach the current state (Done by our SubsystemDescribeHandler)

Then we create a new controller using those operations

And then we read the model from the second controller and make sure that the two subsystems are identical
ModelNode modelB = servicesB.readWholeModel();

To test the removal of the the subsystem and child resources we modify the testSubsystemRemoval() test provided by the archetype:

We provide xml for the subsystem installing a child, which in turn installs a TrackerService

Having installed the xml into the controller we make sure the TrackerService is there

This call from the subsystem test harness will call remove for each level in our subsystem, children first and validate
that the subsystem model is empty at the end.

Finally we check that all the services were removed by the remove handlers

For good measure let us throw in another test which adds a deployment-type and also changes its attribute at runtime. So first of all boot up the controller with the same xml we have been using so far

Now create an operation which does the same as the following CLI command /subsystem=tracker/type=foo:add(tick=1000)

Execute the operation and make sure it was successful

Read the whole model and make sure that the original data is still there (i.e. the same as what was done by testInstallIntoController()

Then make sure our new type has been added:

Then we call write-attribute to change the tick value of /subsystem=tracker/type=foo:

To give you exposure to other ways of doing things, now instead of reading the whole model to check the attribute, we call read-attribute instead, and make sure it has the value we set it to.

Since each type installs its own copy of TrackerService, we get the TrackerService for type=foo from the service container exposed by the kernel services and make sure it has the right value

TypeDefinition.TICK.

Add the deployers

When discussing SubsystemAddHandler we did not mention the work done to install the deployers, which is done in the following method:

This adds an extra step which is responsible for installing deployment processors. You can add as many as you like, or avoid adding any all together depending on your needs. Each processor has a Phase and a priority. Phases are sequential, and a deployment passes through each phases deployment processors. The priority specifies where within a phase the processor appears. See org.jboss.as.server.deployment.Phase for more information about phases.

In our case we are keeping it simple and staying with one deployment processor with the phase and priority created for us by the maven archetype. The phases will be explained in the next section. The deployment processor is as follows:

The deploy() method is called when a deployment is being deployed. In this case we look for the TrackerService instance for the service name created from the deployment's suffix. If there is one it means that we are meant to be tracking deployments with this suffix (i.e. TypeAddHandler was called for this suffix), and if we find one we add the deployment's name to it. Similarly undeploy() is called when a deployment is being undeployed, and if there is a TrackerService instance for the deployment's suffix, we remove the deployment's name from it.

Deployment phases and attachments

The code in the SubsystemDeploymentProcessor uses an attachment, which is the means of communication between the individual deployment processors. A deployment processor belonging to a phase may create an attachment which is then read further along the chain of deployment unit processors. In the above example we look for the Attachments.DEPLOYMENT_ROOT attachment, which is a view of the file structure of the deployment unit put in place before the chain of deployment unit processors is invoked.

As mentioned above, the deployment unit processors are organized in phases, and have a relative order within each phase. A deployment unit passes through all the deployment unit processors in that order. A deployment unit processor may choose to take action or not depending on what attachments are available. Let's take a quick look at what the deployment unit processors for in the phases described in org.jboss.as.server.deployment.Phase.

STRUCTURE

The deployment unit processors in this phase determine the structure of a deployment, and looks for sub deployments and metadata files.

PARSE

In this phase the deployment unit processors parse the deployment descriptors and build up the annotation index. Class-Path entries from the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF are added.

DEPENDENCIES

Extra class path dependencies are added. For example if deploying a war file, the commonly needed dependencies for a web application are added.

CONFIGURE_MODULE

In this phase the modular class loader for the deployment is created. No attempt should be made loading classes from the deployment until after this phase.

POST_MODULE

Now that our class loader has been constructed we have access to the classes. In this stage deployment processors may use the Attachments.REFLECTION_INDEX attachment which is a deployment index used to obtain members of classes in the deployment, and to invoke upon them, bypassing the inefficiencies of using java.lang.reflect directly.

INSTALL

Install new services coming from the deployment.

CLEANUP

Attachments put in place earlier in the deployment unit processor chain may be removed here.

Integrate with JBoss AS 7

Now that we have all the code needed for our subsystem, we can build our project by running mvn install

This will have built our project and assembled a module for us that can be used for installing it into JBoss AS 7. If you go to the target/module folder where you built the project you will see the module

The module.xml comes from src/main/resources/module/main/module.xml and is used to define your module. It says that it contains the acme-subsystem.jar:

And has a default set of dependencies needed by every subsystem created. If your subsystem requires additional module dependencies you can add them here before building and installing.

Note that the name of the module corresponds to the directory structure containing it. Now copy the target/module/com/acme/corp/tracker/main/ directory and its contents to $AS7/modules/com/acme/corp/tracker/main/ (where $AS7 is the root of your JBoss AS 7 install).

Next we need to modify $AS7/standalone/configuration/standalone.xml. First we need to add our new module to the <extensions> section:

And then we have to add our subsystem to the <profile> section:

Adding this to a managed domain works exactly the same apart from in this case you need to modify $AS7/domain/configuration/domain.xml.

Now start up JBoss AS 7 by running $AS7/bin/standalone.sh and you should see messages like these after the server has started, which means our subsystem has been added and our TrackerService is working:

If you run the command line interface you can execute some commands to see more about the subsystem. For example

will return a lot of information, including what we provided in the DescriptionProviders we created to document our subsystem.

To see the current subsystem state you can execute

We can remove both the deployment types which removes them from the model:

You should now see the output from the TrackerService instances having stopped.

Now, let's add the war tracker again:

and the JBoss AS 7 console should show the messages coming from the war TrackerService again.

Now let us deploy something. You can find two maven projects for test wars already built at test1.zip and test2.zip. If you download them and extract them to /Downloads/test1 and /Downloads/test2, you can see that /Downloads/test1/target/test1.war contains a META-INF/cool.txt while /Downloads/test2/target/test2.war does not contain that file. From CLI deploy test1.war first:

And you should now see the output from the war TrackerService list the deployments:

So our test1.war got picked up as a 'cool' deployment. Now if we deploy test2.war

You will see that deployment get picked up as well but since there is no META-INF/cool.txt it is not marked as a 'cool' deployment:

An undeploy

is also reflected in the TrackerService output:

Finally, we registered a write attribute handler for the tick property of the type so we can change the frequency

You should now see the output from the TrackerService happen every second

If you open AS7/standalone/configuration/standalone.xml you can see that our subsystem entry reflects the current state of the subsystem:

Expressions

Expressions

What are expressions

Expressions are mechanism that enables you to support variables in your attributes, for instance when you want that value of attribute is resolved using system / environment properties.

an example for expression is this:

which means that value should be taken from system propertey named jboss.bind.address.management and if it is not defined use 127.0.0.1

What properties type are supported

  • system properties
  • environment properties, prefixed with env.

How to support expressions in subsystems

The easiest way is by using AttributeDefinition that provides support for expression just just by using it right.

when we create AttributeDefinition all we need to do is mark that is allows expression. Here is an example how to define an attribute that allows expressions to be used.

Then later when you are parsing the xml configuration you should use attribute definition to set value to model.

Note that this just helps you properly set the value to the model node you are working on, so no need to additionally set anything to the model for this attribute. Method parseAndSetParameter parses the value that was read from xml for possible expressions in it and if it finds it it creates special model node that defines that node is of type expression.

Later in your operation handlers where you implement populateModel and have to set model you also use this attribute definition.

This will make sure that attribute that is passed to operation is valid and nothing is lost and also that default values are used.

As last step we need to use the value of the attribute? This is usually needed inside of the performRuntime method

As you can see resolving of attribute's value is not done until it is needed, that way we do not loose any information in the model and can assure that also marshalling is done properly, where we must marshall back the unresolved value.

Attribute definitinon also helps you with that:


Labels:
None
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.