Hibernate.orgCommunity Documentation
3.3.0.GA
Copyright © 2004 Red Hat Middleware, LLC.
The Envers project aims to enable easy auditing of persistent classes. All that you
have to do is annotate your persistent class or some of its properties, that you
want to audit, with @Audited
. For each audited entity, a table
will be created, which will hold the history of changes made to the entity. You
can then retrieve and query historical data without much effort.
Similarly to Subversion, the library has a concept of revisions. Basically, one transaction is one revision (unless the transaction didn't modify any audited entities). As the revisions are global, having a revision number, you can query for various entities at that revision, retrieving a (partial) view of the database at that revision. You can find a revision number having a date, and the other way round, you can get the date at which a revision was commited.
The library works with Hibernate and requires Hibernate Annotations or Entity Manager. For the auditing to work properly, the entities must have immutable unique identifiers (primary keys). You can use Envers wherever Hibernate works: standalone, inside JBoss AS, with JBoss Seam or Spring.
Some of the features:
auditing of all mappings defined by the JPA specification
auditing of Hibernate mappings, which extend JPA, like custom types and collections/maps of "simple" types (Strings, Integers, etc.) (see also Chapter 9, Mapping exceptions)
logging data for each revision using a "revision entity"
querying historical data
When configuring your Hibernate (persistence.xml
if you are using JPA,
hibernate.cfg.xml
or other if you are using Hibernate directly), add the following event
listeners: (this will allow Envers to check if any audited entities were modified)
<persistence-unit ...> <provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider> <class>...</class> <properties> <property name="hibernate.dialect" ... /> <!-- other hibernate properties --> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-insert" value="org.hibernate.ejb.event.EJB3PostInsertEventListener,org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-update" value="org.hibernate.ejb.event.EJB3PostUpdateEventListener,org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-delete" value="org.hibernate.ejb.event.EJB3PostDeleteEventListener,org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.pre-collection-update" value="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.pre-collection-remove" value="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-collection-recreate" value="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> </properties> </persistence-unit>
The EJB3Post...EvenListener
s are needed, so that ejb3 entity lifecycle callback
methods work (@PostPersist, @PostUpdate, @PostRemove
.
Then, annotate your persistent class with @Audited
- this will make all
properties audited. For example:
import org.hibernate.envers.Audited; import javax.persistence.Entity; import javax.persistence.Id; import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; import javax.persistence.Column; @Entity @Audited // that's the important part :) public class Person { @Id @GeneratedValue private int id; private String name; private String surname; @ManyToOne private Address address; // add getters, setters, constructors, equals and hashCode here }
And the referenced entity:
@Entity @Audited public class Address { @Id @GeneratedValue private int id; private String streetName; private Integer houseNumber; private Integer flatNumber; @OneToMany(mappedBy = "address") private Set<Person> persons; // add getters, setters, constructors, equals and hashCode here }
And that's it! You create, modify and delete the entites as always. If you look
at the generated schema, you will notice that it is unchanged by adding auditing
for the Address and Person entities. Also, the data they hold is the same. There are,
however, two new tables - Address_AUD
and Person_AUD
,
which store the historical data, whenever you commit a transaction.
Instead of annotating the whole class and auditing all properties, you can annotate
only some persistent properties with @Audited
. This will cause only
these properties to be audited.
You can access the audit (history) of an entity using the AuditReader
interface, which you
can obtain when having an open EntityManager.
AuditReader reader = AuditReaderFactory.get(entityManager); Person oldPerson = reader.find(Person.class, personId, revision)
The T find(Class<T> cls, Object primaryKey, Number revision)
method returns an entity with the given primary key, with the data it contained at
the given revision. If the entity didn't exist at this revision, null
is returned. Only the audited properties will be set on the returned entity.
The rest will be null
.
You can also get a list of revisions at which an entity was modified using the
getRevisions
method, as well as retrieve the date,
at which a revision was created using the getRevisionDate
method.
For example, using the entities defined above, the following code will generate
revision number 1, which will contain two new Person
and
two new Address
entities:
entityManager.getTransaction().begin(); Address address1 = new Address("Privet Drive", 4); Person person1 = new Person("Harry", "Potter", address1); Address address2 = new Address("Grimmauld Place", 12); Person person2 = new Person("Hermione", "Granger", address2); entityManager.persist(address1); entityManager.persist(address2); entityManager.persist(person1); entityManager.persist(person2); entityManager.getTransaction().commit();
Now we change some entities. This will generate revision number 2, which will contain
modifications of one person entity and two address entities (as the collection of
persons living at address2
and address1
changes):
entityManager.getTransaction().begin(); Address address1 = entityManager.find(Address.class, address1.getId()); Person person2 = entityManager.find(Person.class, person2.getId()); // Changing the address's house number address1.setHouseNumber(5) // And moving Hermione to Harry person2.setAddress(address1); entityManager.getTransaction().commit();
We can retrieve the old versions (the audit) easily:
AuditReader reader = AuditReaderFactory.get(entityManager); Person person2_rev1 = reader.find(Person.class, person2.getId(), 1); assert person2_rev1.getAddress().equals(new Address("Grimmauld Place", 12)); Address address1_rev1 = reader.find(Address.class, address1.getId(), 1); assert address1_rev1.getPersons().getSize() == 1; // and so on
To start working with Envers, all configuration that you must do is add the event listeners to persistence.xml, as described in the Chapter 1, Quickstart.
However, as Envers generates some entities, and maps them to tables, it is possible to set the prefix and suffix that is added to the entity name to create an audit table for an entity, as well as set the names of the fields that are generated.
In more detail, here are the properites that you can set:
Table 3.1. Envers Configuration Properties
Property name | Default value | Description |
---|---|---|
org.hibernate.envers.audit_table_prefix | String that will be prepended to the name of an audited entity to create the name of the entity, that will hold audit information. | |
org.hibernate.envers.audit_table_suffix | _AUD |
String that will be appended to the name of an audited entity to create
the name of the entity, that will hold audit information. If you
audit an entity with a table name Person, in the default setting Envers
will generate a Person_AUD table to store historical data.
|
org.hibernate.envers.revision_field_name | REV | Name of a field in the audit entity that will hold the revision number. |
org.hibernate.envers.revision_type_field_name | REVTYPE | Name of a field in the audit entity that will hold the type of the revision (currently, this can be: add, mod, del). |
org.hibernate.envers.revision_on_collection_change | true | Should a revision be generated when a not-owned relation field changes (this can be either a collection in a one-to-many relation, or the field using "mappedBy" attribute in a one-to-one relation). |
org.hibernate.envers.do_not_audit_optimistic_locking_field | true |
When true, properties to be used for optimistic locking, annotated with
@Version , will be automatically not audited
(their history won't be stored; it normally doesn't make sense to store it).
|
org.hibernate.envers.store_data_at_delete | false | Should the entity data be stored in the revision when the entity is deleted (instead of only storing the id and all other properties as null). This is not normally needed, as the data is present in the last-but-one revision. Sometimes, however, it is easier and more efficient to access it in the last revision (then the data that the entity contained before deletion is stored twice). |
org.hibernate.envers.default_schema | null (same as normal tables) |
The default schema name that should be used for audit tables. Can be overriden using the
@AuditTable(schema="...") annotation. If not present, the schema will
be the same as the schema of the normal tables.
|
org.hibernate.envers.default_catalog | null (same as normal tables) |
The default catalog name that should be used for audit tables. Can be overriden using the
@AuditTable(catalog="...") annotation. If not present, the catalog will
be the same as the catalog of the normal tables.
|
To change the name of the revision table and its fields (the table, in which the
numbers of revisions and their timestamps are stored), you can use the
@RevisionEntity
annotation.
For more information, see Chapter 4, Logging data for revisions.
To set the value of any of the properties described above, simply add an entry to
your persistence.xml
. For example:
<persistence-unit ...> <provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider> <class>...</class> <properties> <property name="hibernate.dialect" ... /> <!-- other hibernate properties --> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-insert" value="org.hibernate.ejb.event.EJB3PostInsertEventListener,org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-update" value="org.hibernate.ejb.event.EJB3PostUpdateEventListener,org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-delete" value="org.hibernate.ejb.event.EJB3PostDeleteEventListener,org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.pre-collection-update" value="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.pre-collection-remove" value="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="hibernate.ejb.event.post-collection-recreate" value="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" /> <property name="org.hibernate.envers.versionsTableSuffix" value="_V" /> <property name="org.hibernate.envers.revisionFieldName" value="ver_rev" /> <!-- other envers properties --> </properties> </persistence-unit>
The EJB3Post...EvenListener
s are needed, so that ejb3 entity lifecycle callback
methods work (@PostPersist, @PostUpdate, @PostRemove
.
You can also set the name of the audit table on a per-entity basis, using the
@AuditTable
annotation. It may be tedious to add this
annotation to every audited entity, so if possible, it's better to use a prefix/suffix.
If you have a mapping with secondary tables, audit tables for them will be generated in
the same way (by adding the prefix and suffix). If you wish to overwrite this behaviour,
you can use the @SecondaryAuditTable
and
@SecondaryAuditTables
annotations.
If you'd like to override auditing behaviour of some fields/properties in an embedded component, you can use
the @AuditOverride(s)
annotation on the place where you use the component.
If you want to audit a relation mapped with @OneToMany+@JoinColumn
,
please see Chapter 9, Mapping exceptions for a description of the additional
@AuditJoinTable
annotation that you'll probably want to use.
If you want to audit a relation, where the target entity is not audited (that is the case for example with
dictionary-like entities, which don't change and don't have to be audited), just annotate it with
@Audited(targetAuditMode = RelationTargetAuditMode.NOT_AUDITED)
. Then, when reading historic
versions of your entity, the relation will always point to the "current" related entity.
Envers provides an easy way to log additional data for each revision. You simply need
to annotate one entity with @RevisionEntity
, and a new instance of
this entity will be persisted when a new revision is created (that is, whenever an
audited entity is modified). As revisions are global, you can have at most one revisions entity.
This entity must have at least two properties:
an integer- or long-valued property, annotated with @RevisionNumber
. Most
often, this will be an auto-generated primary key.
a long- or j.u.Date- valued property, annotated with @RevisionTimestamp
. Value of
this property will be automatically set by Envers.
You can either add these properties to your entity, or extend
org.hibernate.envers.DefaultRevisionEntity
, which already has those two properties.
When using a Date
, instead of a long/Long
for the revision timestamp,
take care not to use a mapping of the property which will loose precision (for example, using
@Temporal(DATE)
is wrong, as it doesn't store the time information, so many of your
revisions will appear to happen at exactly the same time). A good choice is a
@Temporal(TIMESTAMP)
.
To fill the entity with additional data, you'll need to implement the
org.jboss.envers.RevisionListener
interface. Its newRevision method will
be called when a new revision is created, before persisting the revision entity.
The implementation should be stateless and thread-safe. The listener then has to be
attached to the revisions entity by specifying it as a parameter to the
@RevisionEntity
annotation.
Alternatively, you can use the getCurrentRevision
method of the
AuditReader
interface to obtain the current revision, and fill it with desired information.
The method has a persist
parameter specifying, if the revision entity should be persisted
before returning. If set to true
, the revision number will be available in the returned
revision entity (as it is normally generated by the database), but the revision entity will be persisted
regardless of wheter there are any audited entities changed. If set to false
, the revision
number will be null
, but the revision entity will be persisted only if some audited entities
have changed.
A simplest example of a revisions entity, which with each revision associates the username of the user making the change is:
package org.jboss.envers.example; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionEntity; import org.hibernate.envers.DefaultRevisionEntity; import javax.persistence.Entity; @Entity @RevisionEntity(ExampleListener.class) public class ExampleRevEntity extends DefaultRevisionEntity { private String username; public String getUsername() { return username; } public void setUsername(String username) { this.username = username; } }
Or, if you don't want to extend any class:
package org.hibernate.envers.example; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionNumber; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionTimestamp; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionEntity; import javax.persistence.Id; import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; import javax.persistence.Entity; @Entity @RevisionEntity(ExampleListener.class) public class ExampleRevEntity { @Id @GeneratedValue @RevisionNumber private int id; @RevisionTimestamp private long timestamp; private String username; // Getters, setters, equals, hashCode ... }
An example listener, which, if used in a JBoss Seam application, stores the currently logged in user username:
package org.hibernate.envers.example; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionListener; import org.jboss.seam.security.Identity; import org.jboss.seam.Component; public class ExampleListener implements RevisionListener { public void newRevision(Object revisionEntity) { ExampleRevEntity exampleRevEntity = (ExampleRevEntity) revisionEntity; Identity identity = (Identity) Component.getInstance("org.jboss.seam.security.identity"); exampleRevEntity.setUsername(identity.getUsername()); } }
Having an "empty" revision entity - that is, with no additional properties except the two mandatory ones - is also an easy way to change the names of the table and of the properties in the revisions table automatically generated by Envers.
In case there is no entity annotated with @RevisionEntity
, a default
table will be generated, with the name REVINFO
.
You can think of historic data as having two dimension. The first - horizontal - is the state of the database at a given revision. Thus, you can query for entities as they were at revision N. The second - vertical - are the revisions, at which entities changed. Hence, you can query for revisions, in which a given entity changed.
The queries in Envers are similar to Hibernate Criteria, so if you are common with them, using Envers queries will be much easier.
The main limitation of the current queries implementation is that you cannot traverse relations. You can only specify constraints on the ids of the related entities, and only on the "owning" side of the relation. This however will be changed in future releases.
Please note, that queries on the audited data will be in many cases much slower than corresponding queries on "live" data, as they involve correlated subselects.
The entry point for this type of queries is:
AuditQuery query = getAuditReader().createQuery().forEntitiesAtRevision(MyEntity.class, revisionNumber);
You can then specify constraints, which should be met by the entities returned, by
adding restrictions, which can be obtained using the AuditEntity
factory class. For example, to select only entities, where the "name" property
is equal to "John":
query.add(AuditEntity.property("name").eq("John"));
And to select only entites that are related to a given entity:
query.add(AuditEntity.property("address").eq(relatedEntityInstance)); // or query.add(AuditEntity.relatedId("address").eq(relatedEntityId));
You can limit the number of results, order them, and set aggregations and projections
(except grouping) in the usual way.
When your query is complete, you can obtain the results by calling the
getSingleResult()
or getResultList()
methods.
A full query, can look for example like this:
List personsAtAddress = getAuditReader().createQuery() .forEntitiesAtRevision(Person.class, 12) .addOrder(AuditEntity.property("surname").desc()) .add(AuditEntity.relatedId("address").eq(addressId)) .setFirstResult(4) .setMaxResults(2) .getResultList();
The entry point for this type of queries is:
AuditQuery query = getAuditReader().createQuery() .forRevisionsOfEntity(MyEntity.class, false, true);
You can add constraints to this query in the same way as to the previous one. There are some additional possibilities:
AuditEntity.revisionNumber()
you can specify constraints, projections
and order on the revision number, in which the audited entity was modified
AuditEntity.revisionProperty(propertyName)
you can specify constraints,
projections and order on a property of the revision entity, corresponding to the revision
in which the audited entity was modified
AuditEntity.revisionType()
gives you access as above to the type of
the revision (ADD, MOD, DEL).
Using these methods,
you can order the query results by revision number, set projection or constraint
the revision number to be greater or less than a specified value, etc. For example, the
following query will select the smallest revision number, at which entity of class
MyEntity
with id entityId
has changed, after revision
number 42:
Number revision = (Number) getAuditReader().createQuery() .forRevisionsOfEntity(MyEntity.class, false, true) .setProjection(AuditEntity.revisionNumber().min()) .add(AuditEntity.id().eq(entityId)) .add(AuditEntity.revisionNumber().gt(42)) .getSingleResult();
The second additional feature you can use in queries for revisions is the ability
to maximalize/minimize a property. For example, if you want to select the
revision, at which the value of the actualDate
for a given entity
was larger then a given value, but as small as possible:
Number revision = (Number) getAuditReader().createQuery() .forRevisionsOfEntity(MyEntity.class, false, true) // We are only interested in the first revision .setProjection(AuditEntity.revisionNumber().min()) .add(AuditEntity.property("actualDate").minimize() .add(AuditEntity.property("actualDate").ge(givenDate)) .add(AuditEntity.id().eq(givenEntityId))) .getSingleResult();
The minimize()
and maximize()
methods return a criteria,
to which you can add constraints, which must be met by the entities with the
maximized/minimized properties.
You probably also noticed that there are two boolean parameters, passed when
creating the query. The first one, selectEntitiesOnly
, is only valid when
you don't set an explicit projection. If true, the result of the query will be
a list of entities (which changed at revisions satisfying the specified
constraints).
If false, the result will be a list of three element arrays. The
first element will be the changed entity instance. The second will be an entity
containing revision data (if no custom entity is used, this will be an instance
of DefaultRevisionEntity
). The third will be the type of the
revision (one of the values of the RevisionType
enumeration:
ADD, MOD, DEL).
The second parameter, selectDeletedEntities
, specifies if revisions,
in which the entity was deleted should be included in the results. If yes, such entities
will have the revision type DEL and all fields, except the id,
null
.
If you'd like to generate the database schema file with the Hibernate Tools Ant task,
you'll probably notice that the generated file doesn't contain definitions of audit
tables. To generate also the audit tables, you simply need to use
org.hibernate.tool.ant.EnversHibernateToolTask
instead of the usual
org.hibernate.tool.ant.HibernateToolTask
. The former class extends
the latter, and only adds generation of the version entities. So you can use the task
just as you used to.
For example:
<target name="schemaexport" depends="build-demo" description="Exports a generated schema to DB and file"> <taskdef name="hibernatetool" classname="org.hibernate.tool.ant.EnversHibernateToolTask" classpathref="build.demo.classpath"/> <hibernatetool destdir="."> <classpath> <fileset refid="lib.hibernate" /> <path location="${build.demo.dir}" /> <path location="${build.main.dir}" /> </classpath> <jpaconfiguration persistenceunit="ConsolePU" /> <hbm2ddl drop="false" create="true" export="false" outputfilename="versioning-ddl.sql" delimiter=";" format="true"/> </hibernatetool> </target>
Will generate the following schema:
create table Address ( id integer generated by default as identity (start with 1), flatNumber integer, houseNumber integer, streetName varchar(255), primary key (id) ); create table Address_AUD ( id integer not null, REV integer not null, flatNumber integer, houseNumber integer, streetName varchar(255), REVTYPE tinyint, primary key (id, REV) ); create table Person ( id integer generated by default as identity (start with 1), name varchar(255), surname varchar(255), address_id integer, primary key (id) ); create table Person_AUD ( id integer not null, REV integer not null, name varchar(255), surname varchar(255), REVTYPE tinyint, address_id integer, primary key (id, REV) ); create table REVINFO ( REV integer generated by default as identity (start with 1), REVTSTMP bigint, primary key (REV) ); alter table Person add constraint FK8E488775E4C3EA63 foreign key (address_id) references Address;
For each audited entity (that is, for each entity containing at least one audited field), an audit
table is created. By default, the audit table's name is created by adding a "_AUD" suffix to
the original name, but this can be overriden by specifing a different suffix/prefix
(see Chapter 3, Configuration) or on a per-entity basis using the
@AuditTable
annotation.
The audit table has the following fields:
id of the original entity (this can be more then one column, if using an embedded or multiple id)
revision number - an integer
revision type - a small integer
audited fields from the original entity
The primary key of the audit table is the combination of the original id of the entity and the revision number - there can be at most one historic entry for a given entity instance at a given revision.
The current entity data is stored in the original table and in the audit table. This is a duplication of data, however as this solution makes the query system much more powerful, and as memory is cheap, hopefully this won't be a major drawback for the users. A row in the audit table with entity id ID, revision N and data D means: entity with id ID has data D from revision N upwards. Hence, if we want to find an entity at revision M, we have to search for a row in the audit table, which has the revision number smaller or equal to M, but as large as possible. If no such row is found, or a row with a "deleted" marker is found, it means that the entity didn't exist at that revision.
The "revision type" field can currently have three values: 0, 1, 2, which means, respectively, ADD, MOD and DEL. A row with a revision of type DEL will only contain the id of the entity and no data (all fields NULL), as it only serves as a marker saying "this entity was deleted at that revision".
Additionaly, there is a "REVINFO" table generated, which contains only two fields:
the revision id and revision timestamp. A row is inserted into this table on each
new revision, that is, on each commit of a transaction, which changes audited data.
The name of this table can be configured, as well as additional content stored,
using the @RevisionEntity
annotation, see Chapter 4, Logging data for revisions.
While global revisions are a good way to provide correct auditing of relations, some people have pointed out that this may be a bottleneck in systems, where data is very often modified. One viable solution is to introduce an option to have an entity "locally revisioned", that is revisions would be created for it independently. This wouldn't enable correct versioning of relations, but wouldn't also require the "REVINFO" table. Another possibility if to have "revisioning groups", that is groups of entities which share revision numbering. Each such group would have to consist of one or more strongly connected component of the graph induced by relations between entities. Your opinions on the subject are very welcome on the forum! :)
Envers, as a module of Hibernate, uses a standard Maven2 build. So all the usual build targets (compile, test, install) will work.
You can check out the source code from SVN, or browse it using FishEye.
The tests use, by default, use a H2 in-memory database. The configuration
file can be found in src/test/resources/hibernate.test.cfg.xml
.
The tests use TestNG, and can be found in the
org.hibernate.envers.test.integration
package
(or rather, in subpackages of this package).
The tests aren't unit tests, as they don't test individual classes, but the behaviour
and interaction of many classes, hence the name of package.
A test normally consists of an entity (or two entities) that will be audited and extends the
AbstractEntityTest
class, which has one abstract method:
configure(Ejb3Configuration)
. The role of this method is to add the entities
that will be used in the test to the configuration.
The test data is in most cases created in the "initData" method (which is called once before the tests from this class are executed), which normally creates a couple of revisions, by persisting and updating entities. The tests first check if the revisions, in which entities where modified are correct (the testRevisionCounts method), and if the historic data is correct (the testHistoryOfXxx methods).
Bags (the corresponding Java type is List), as they can contain non-unique elements. The reason is that persisting, for example a bag of String-s, violates a principle of relational databases: that each table is a set of tuples. In case of bags, however (which require a join table), if there is a duplicate element, the two tuples corresponding to the elements will be the same. Hibernate allows this, however Envers (or more precisely: the database connector) will throw an exception when trying to persist two identical elements, because of a unique constraint violation.
There are at least two ways out if you need bag semantics:
use an indexed collection, with the @IndexColumn
annotation, or
provide a unique id for your elements with the @CollectionId
annotation.
When a collection is mapped using these two annotations, Hibernate doesn't generate a join table. Envers, however, has to do this, so that when you read the revisions in which the related entity has changed, you don't get false results.
To be able to name the additional join table, there is a special annotation:
@AuditJoinTable
, which has similar semantics to JPA's
@JoinTable
.
One special case are relations mapped with @OneToMany
+@JoinColumn
on
the one side, and @ManyToOne
+@JoinColumn(insertable=false, updatable=false
)
on the many side.
Such relations are in fact bidirectional, but the owning side is the collection (see alse
here).
To properly audit such relations with Envers, you can use the @AuditMappedBy
annotation.
It enables you to specify the reverse property (using the mappedBy
element). In case
of indexed collections, the index column must also be mapped in the referenced entity (using
@Column(insertable=false, updatable=false)
, and specified using
positionMappedBy
. This annotation will affect only the way
Envers works. Please note that the annotation is experimental and may change in the future.
With the inclusion of Envers as a Hibernate module, some of the public API and configuration defaults
changed. In general, "versioning" is renamed to "auditing" (to avoid confusion with the annotation used
for indicating an optimistic locking field - @Version
).
Because of changing some configuration defaults, there should be no more problems using Envers out-of-the-box with Oracle and other databases, which don't allow tables and field names to start with "_".
Public API changes involve changing "versioning" to "auditing". So, @Versioned
became @Audited
; @VersionsTable
became @AuditTable
and so on.
Also, the query interface has changed slightly, mainly in the part for specifying restrictions, projections and order. Please refer to the Javadoc for further details.
First of all, the name of the event listener changed. It is now named
org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener
, instead of
org.jboss.envers.event.VersionsEventListener
. So to make Envers
work, you will have to change these settings in your persistence.xml
or Hibernate configuration.
Secondly, the names of the audit (versions) tables and additional auditing (versioning) fields
changed. The default suffix added to the table name is now _AUD
, instead of
_versions
. The name of the field that holds the revision number, and which
is added to each audit (versions) table, is now REV
, instead of
_revision
. Finally, the name of the field that holds the type of the revision,
is now REVTYPE
, instead of _rev_type
.
If you have a schema generated with the old version of Envers, you will have to set those properties, to use the new version of Envers without problems:
<persistence-unit ...> <provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider> <class>...</class> <properties> <property name="hibernate.dialect" ... /> <!-- other hibernate properties --> <!-- Envers listeners --> <property name="org.hibernate.envers.auditTableSuffix" value="_versions" /> <property name="org.hibernate.envers.revisionFieldName" value="_revision" /> <property name="org.hibernate.envers.revisionTypeFieldName" value="_rev_type" /> <!-- other envers properties --> </properties> </persistence-unit>
The org.hibernate.envers.doNotAuditOptimisticLockingField
property is
now by default true
, instead of false
. You probably
never would want to audit the optimistic locking field.
Also, the org.hibernate.envers.warnOnUnsupportedTypes
configuraiton
option was removed. In case you are using some unsupported types, use the @NotAudited
annotation.
See Chapter 3, Configuration for details on the configuration and a description of the configuration options.
This section applies only if you don't have a custom revision entity. The name of the revision entity generated by default changed, so if you used the default one, you'll have to add a custom revision entity, and map it to the old table. Here's the class that you have to create:
package org.hibernate.envers.example; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionNumber; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionTimestamp; import org.hibernate.envers.RevisionEntity; import javax.persistence.Id; import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; import javax.persistence.Entity; import javax.persistence.Column; import javax.persistence.Table; @Entity @RevisionEntity @Table(name="_revisions_info") public class ExampleRevEntity { @Id @GeneratedValue @RevisionNumber @Column(name="revision_id") private int id; @RevisionTimestamp @Column(name="revision_timestamp") private long timestamp; // Getters, setters, equals, hashCode ... }
Some useful links:
JIRA issue tracker (when adding issues concerning Envers, be sure to select the "envers" component!)
Copyright © 2004 Red Hat Middleware, LLC.