public abstract class BaseTransactionalDataRegion extends BaseRegion implements TransactionalDataRegion
TransactionalDataRegion implementors.address, cacheAdapter, invalidateState, invalidationMutex, replication, transactionManager| Constructor and Description |
|---|
BaseTransactionalDataRegion(CacheAdapter cacheAdapter,
String name,
CacheDataDescription metadata,
TransactionManager transactionManager,
RegionFactory factory) |
| Modifier and Type | Method and Description |
|---|---|
CacheDataDescription |
getCacheDataDescription() |
boolean |
isTransactionAware()
Is the underlying cache implementation aware of (and "participating in")
ongoing JTA transactions?
Regions which report that they are transaction-aware are considered
"synchronous", in that we assume we can immediately (i.e.
|
checkValid, contains, destroy, get, getAddress, getCacheAdapter, getElementCountInMemory, getElementCountOnDisk, getName, getOwnerForPut, getSizeInMemory, getTimeout, getTransactionManager, invalidateRegion, isValid, nextTimestamp, resume, suspend, toMapclone, equals, finalize, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, toString, wait, wait, waitcontains, destroy, getElementCountInMemory, getElementCountOnDisk, getName, getSizeInMemory, getTimeout, nextTimestamp, toMappublic BaseTransactionalDataRegion(CacheAdapter cacheAdapter, String name, CacheDataDescription metadata, TransactionManager transactionManager, RegionFactory factory)
public CacheDataDescription getCacheDataDescription()
getCacheDataDescription in interface TransactionalDataRegionpublic boolean isTransactionAware()
TransactionalDataRegionisTransactionAware in interface TransactionalDataRegionCopyright © 2012 JBoss by Red Hat. All Rights Reserved.